BCPHR Author Hub

BCPH Stacked Whitebckgrd 04

Welcome to the New BCPHR Author Hub

BCPHR Author Hub
Boston Congress of Public Health Review

BCPHR Author Hub

Your peer review and possible publication journey, in four stages.

ISSN 3068-8558 DOI 10.54111 Open Access · CC BY Updated April 2026 [email protected]
Ready to Go? Submit via Scholastica Manuscript Submission Guidelines Read and follow all submission guidelines to reduce chances of desk rejection.
Contact Us
[email protected]

Send questions about peer review before you submit. See what else to email us about ↓

Welcome to the Author Hub

BCPHR is an academic, peer-reviewed, open-access public health journal published by the Boston Congress of Public Health. This Author Hub is your single reference for everything related to submitting and publishing with BCPHR — from your first visit to post-publication. You'll find what you need at every step, including our submission and withdrawal policies, open-access and copyright terms, and manuscript pricing.

How to use this page: The hub is organized in the order most authors move through the publishing process. Start with the four-stage journey at the top to orient yourself, then work through each section as it becomes relevant to you. If you are a returning author, jump directly to the section you need.

Questions? Email [email protected]. All questions about the peer review process must be sent before you submit.

The Hub covers:

  • ·Stage 1 — Before You Submit: Aims and scope, article types, and calls for special editions
  • ·Stage 2 — Prepare Your Manuscript: Templates, reporting standards, required disclosures, and equity and AI use policies
  • ·Stage 3 — Submit Your Work: How to submit on Scholastica, article processing charges, and annual submission windows
  • ·Stage 4 — After Submission: Peer review process, editorial decisions, corrections, copyright, and post-publication discussion
  • ·Submission Flowchart: Visual guide to author and reviewer submission pathways
  • ·Article Templates: Google Docs templates for all ten article and submission material types
  • ·Article Processing Charges: All fees, special charges, and the fee waiver policy
  • ·AI Use Policy: Which AI tools are acceptable, which are not, and how to disclose the ones you used
  • ·Policies and Standards Library: Full reference shelf of editorial and publishing policies, and international standards alignment
Peer Review and Possible Publication Journey

Four Stages, From Start to Decision

Most authors move through these four stages in order. Each stage links to the small set of pages you'll actually need at that point. Nothing more, nothing less.

1Before
2Prepare
3Submit
4After
01
Stage 1

Before You Submit

Understand what BCPHR publishes, who reads it, and which article type fits your work. Start here on your first visit.

02
Stage 2

Prepare Your Manuscript

Everything you need before you upload: templates, reporting standards, required disclosures, and our equity and AI use policies.

03
Stage 3

Submit Your Work

How to submit on Scholastica, what it costs, and when our review windows open.

Check the guidelines first. Manuscripts that skip the templates and formatting rules are the ones we send back. Both links are here so you don't have to hunt for them.
Submission Guidelines Submit via Scholastica →
04
Stage 4

After Submission

What happens during our rigorous, meaningful peer review, how decisions get made, and what to do if you need to correct, retract, appeal, or respond after publication.

Annual Submission Timeline

These are the months BCPHR is open for submissions each year. The schedule repeats annually — the same months apply every year, not just for a single year.

JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Open for submissions Closed — submissions not accepted
Author and Review Submission Flowchart
Start Author or Reviewer? Reviewer Reviewer Peer review guidelines Author What Type of Content? Research-Based Submissions Original Research Article Review Article Supplement Evidence-Based Opinions Research Letter Commentary / Op-Ed Other Submissions Atypical Article Blog Poster Electronic Media Peer reviewed Peer reviewed Peer Review Contingent on Content Submit on BCPHR
Supplements

Special-topic editions published by BCPHR. Each title below links directly to where that supplement is published.

Note for the team: replace the entries below with the actual supplement titles and their published URLs.

Article Processing Charges (APC)
$35
Submission / Reading Fee Non-refundable at time of submission, regardless of outcome.
$675
Per Publication Effective April 1, 2026. Applies to all article types. Includes 1 round of Revise and Resubmit.
$150
Additional Rounds of Revise and Resubmit

One round of revise and resubmit is included. Additional rounds cost $150.00 each.

$20
Corrected Manuscript Upload

Only use BCPH templates and follow instructions during the upload process. If you do not, you may be contacted by the managing editor to resubmit your article or face a desk rejection.

$200
Unacknowledged Acceptance Fee

Incurred if author fails to acknowledge article acceptance or requests withdrawal following submission or peer review.

BCPHR is not able to waive fees or provide scholarships for publishing.
Key Policies
No Refunds After Submission
Once a manuscript is submitted, the $35 submission fee is non-refundable regardless of outcome. If the manuscript is withdrawn after peer review has begun, an additional fee will be incurred.
Ask Questions Before Submitting
All questions about the peer review process must be submitted before manuscript submission. BCPHR reserves discretion to answer questions about a manuscript while it is actively under review. Direct questions to [email protected].
Where Can I Find Published Articles?
Articles published prior to January 2025 are available on BCPHR.org.

Articles published in January 2025 and beyond are published on BCPHReview.org.
Submission-to-Publication Timeline
BCPHR runs an efficient, streamlined review process. From submission to publication is typically 8–12 weeks (maximum).

Typical timeline
· Peer review — within ~2 weeks
· Revise & resubmit — ~2 weeks per round

We do not guarantee acceptance; every manuscript receives a meaningful, rigorous peer review. Timelines after a revise-and-resubmit depend on author and editor turnaround.
AI Use Policy
Use AI to sharpen your work, not to write it. Tools that check your grammar, help you find literature, or transcribe your interviews are fine. Tools that generate the actual argument, prose, data, or citations are not. Every word of the manuscript must be yours, and you are accountable for all of it.
Acceptable with disclosure
  • Grammar, spelling, and clarity editingGrammarly, Microsoft Editor, LanguageTool, Word Editor. Line-level corrections to text you wrote.
  • Literature and source discoveryPerplexity, Elicit, Consensus, Semantic Scholar, Scite. Read and verify every source yourself, then cite the original paper, never the AI tool.
  • Reference formattingZotero, EndNote, Mendeley, and their AI-assisted citation features.
  • Transcription of your own recordingsOtter.ai, Rev, Descript for interviews or focus groups, with a human accuracy check against the audio.
  • Translation of text you wroteDeepL, Google Translate, where English is not your first language. Have a fluent colleague review the result.
  • Statistical or code assistanceHelp writing or debugging analysis scripts in R, Python, Stata, or SAS. Describe it in your Methods.
  • Accessibility supportDictation, screen readers, and read-aloud tools used to draft or review your own writing.
Not acceptable
  • Generating manuscript textUsing ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, or any similar tool to draft your abstract, introduction, discussion, or any other section.
  • Generating or completing citationsAI-produced reference lists routinely include papers that do not exist. Fabricated citations are treated as research misconduct.
  • Generating or altering dataNo synthetic data, invented participant quotes, imputed results, or AI-modified figures and images presented as original.
  • Paraphrasing tools used on other people's workQuillBot, Spinbot, and similar rewriting tools. This is plagiarism regardless of how the text is reworded.
  • Listing AI as an author or co-authorAI tools cannot take responsibility for a manuscript and cannot meet ICMJE authorship criteria.
  • Uploading confidential material to public AI toolsApplies especially to peer reviewers: manuscripts under review must never be pasted into a public AI system.

How to disclose AI use

If you used any acceptable tool above, add a short AI Use Statement in your cover letter and immediately before the reference list. Name the tool, the version if known, the date, and what you used it for.

"The authors used Grammarly (June 2026) for grammar and clarity editing of author-written text, and Perplexity (June 2026) to identify candidate sources. All sources were retrieved, read, and verified by the authors. No AI tool was used to generate manuscript content."

If you used no AI tools at all, state that: "No generative AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript."

Your institution's rules come first. Whatever this policy permits, authors must also abide by the AI limitations set by their home institution, their funder, and the stipulations of the IRB or ethics committee that approved the project. Where those rules are stricter than ours, follow the stricter rule. This matters most for anything involving participant data, protected health information, or unpublished results: do not enter that material into an external AI tool unless your IRB protocol and data use agreement explicitly allow it.

Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of everything submitted, including anything an acceptable tool touched. All submissions are screened for plagiarism and AI-generated content. Undisclosed or prohibited AI use may result in desk rejection, retraction after publication, or notification of the authors' institutions.

Still unsure whether a specific tool is allowed? Ask before you submit — email [email protected]. Full detail is in the Originality, AI Use & Plagiarism policy in the Policies and Standards Library.

OPEN ACCESS · CC BY

Authors retain rights to their work. All BCPHR manuscripts are freely available without charge. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full texts without prior permission from the publisher or author.

★ Reference Shelf

Policies and Standards Library

Every BCPHR editorial and publishing policy, in one place. Written for editors, peer reviewers, indexing bodies, and authors who need a deep dive on a specific rule. Use the jump links below to go straight to a category.

Questions

Questions may be submitted to [email protected].

BCPHR Aligns with the Following International Publishing Standards. (Click to Open)
What is PIE-J? PIE-J stands for Presentation & Identification of E-Journals, a National Information Standards Organization Recommended Practice (NISO RP-16-2013). It defines how online journals should present title history, ISSN, publication dates, and edition numbering so that librarians, indexing services, and citation databases can unambiguously identify and cite content. BCPHR follows PIE-J for its edition-to-year crosswalk and article-level identifier consistency, as recommended by PubMed Central.
Contact Us · Editorial Office

Editorial Office

One address reaches the whole editorial team. We answer during our open submission months and aim to reply within five business days.

[email protected]

What to email us about

  • Questions about the peer review process — send these before you submit
  • Whether a specific AI tool is acceptable for your manuscript
  • Which article type or template fits your work
  • Supplement and special edition proposals
  • Corrections, retractions, and post-publication concerns
  • Editorial board and peer reviewer applications

BCPHR reserves discretion to answer questions about a manuscript while it is actively under review.