Complaints and Appeals

BCPH Stacked Whitebckgrd 04
BCPHR — Complaints and Appeals
Stage 4: After Submission

Complaints and Appeals

How to raise concerns about editorial process or appeal a rejection.

ISSN 3068-8558 DOI 10.54111 Open Access · CC BY Updated April 2026

Authors and readers may raise complaints about BCPHR editorial processes or appeal rejection decisions. BCPHR follows COPE guidance on complaints and appeals.

Why This Matters

Accountability at BCPHR

BCPHR is committed to fair and transparent editorial processes. Authors, reviewers, and readers may raise complaints about the editorial process or appeal a rejection decision. All complaints are reviewed by editorial team members not involved in the original decision. This page describes how to file a complaint, what the appeal process looks like, and what outcomes are possible.

Two Distinct Processes

Complaints vs Appeals

!

Complaint

  • Concern about editorial process or conduct
  • Examples: delays, unprofessional reviewer comments, suspected bias, breaches of confidentiality
  • No deadline for filing
  • Reviewed by senior editorial team
  • May result in process changes, apology, or reviewer/editor counseling
?

Appeal

  • Request to reconsider a specific editorial decision
  • Typically filed after a rejection or revise-and-resubmit decision
  • Must be filed within 30 days of the original decision
  • Reviewed by at least two editors not involved in the original decision
  • May result in upheld, overturned, or modified decision
How to File

Filing a Complaint

Complaints about BCPHR editorial processes or staff conduct may be sent to the editorial team via email. BCPHR aims to acknowledge complaints within two weeks of receipt and to resolve them within four weeks. Complaints involving senior editors or the publisher are escalated to a member of the BCPH Board of Directors. Complaints about peer reviewer or author misconduct may be referred to the BCPHR Advisory Board through the Allegations of Misconduct process.

Filing an Appeal

Appeals of editorial decisions must meet three criteria to be considered:

Appeal Requirements

  • The appeal must be received within 30 days of the original decision
  • The author must address all reviewer comments in detail
  • The author must provide a clear rationale for why the decision was erroneous
The Appeal Process

How Appeals Are Reviewed

1

Appeal Submitted

The author submits the appeal through Scholastica with the rationale and point-by-point responses to reviewer comments.

2

Editorial Team Review

The managing editor confirms that the appeal meets the three criteria and forwards to the Editor-in-Chief.

3

Independent Editor Review

At least two editors not involved in the original decision review the manuscript, the original reviewer comments, and the author's appeal.

4

Final Decision

The independent editors render a final decision: uphold the original decision, reverse the original decision, or modify the original decision (e.g., from rejection to revise-and-resubmit). The decision of the independent editors is final.

Outcomes

What Happens Next

Appeal outcomes are communicated to the author within four weeks of submission. If the appeal is successful, the manuscript re-enters the editorial workflow at the appropriate stage. If the appeal is unsuccessful, the original decision stands and the appeal process is complete. Authors may not file successive appeals on the same manuscript.

OPEN ACCESS · CC BY

Authors retain rights to their work. All BCPHR manuscripts are freely available without charge. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full texts without prior permission from the publisher or author.

BCPHR Aligns with the Following International Publishing Standards. (Click to Open)
What is PIE-J? PIE-J stands for Presentation & Identification of E-Journals, a National Information Standards Organization Recommended Practice (NISO RP-16-2013). It defines how online journals should present title history, ISSN, publication dates, and edition numbering so that librarians, indexing services, and citation databases can unambiguously identify and cite content. BCPHR follows PIE-J for its edition-to-year crosswalk and article-level identifier consistency, as recommended by PubMed Central.