Disclosure requirements for authors, editors, and reviewers — financial and non-financial.
All BCPHR authors, editors, and peer reviewers must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Disclosure is not disqualifying; it is a contribution to transparency.
A conflict of interest exists when an individual's professional judgment concerning a primary interest (such as participants' welfare or the validity of research) may be unduly influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain). At BCPHR, all authors, editors, and peer reviewers are required to disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest related to a manuscript. Disclosure does not disqualify a person from participation; it allows readers and decision-makers to evaluate the work in context.
Authors, editors, and reviewers should disclose any relationship or interest that a reasonable reader might consider relevant to the work. Disclosure is not an admission of impropriety. It is a contribution to scientific transparency.
All authors must complete a conflict of interest disclosure at the time of submission, covering the period from the start of the research through publication. BCPHR uses the ICMJE Disclosure Form. If no conflicts exist, the manuscript must include the statement "The authors declare no conflicts of interest." Conflict statements appear in the published manuscript and may be discussed in peer review.
Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest. Editor conflicts include manuscripts authored by close collaborators, individuals at the editor's home institution, individuals with whom the editor has a personal relationship, or manuscripts on topics where the editor has a competing interest. When the editor-in-chief has a conflict, the manuscript is handled by a deputy editor.
Peer reviewers must decline to review manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest. When a reviewer accepts a review invitation, they confirm they have no undisclosed conflicts. If a conflict becomes apparent during review, the reviewer must notify the editor immediately. Reviewer conflicts are treated with the same seriousness as author and editor conflicts.
Disclosure statements appear in the published manuscript so that readers can evaluate the work with full context. BCPHR does not censor or summarize conflict statements; they appear as the author submitted them.
If an undisclosed conflict comes to light after submission or publication, BCPHR follows COPE guidelines. The editorial team will contact the author for clarification. Depending on the nature and severity of the undisclosed conflict, outcomes may include a correction notice, an expression of concern, or in serious cases, retraction. Patterns of undisclosed conflicts may be referred to the BCPHR Advisory Board for investigation per the Allegations of Misconduct process.
Authors retain rights to their work. All BCPHR manuscripts are freely available without charge. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full texts without prior permission from the publisher or author.
BCPHR.org was designed by ComputerAlly.com.
Visit BCPHR‘s publisher, the Boston Congress of Public Health (BCPH).
Email [email protected] for more information.
Click below to make a tax-deductible donation supporting the educational initiatives of the Boston Congress of Public Health, publisher of BCPHR.![]()
© 2025-2026 Boston Congress of Public Health (BCPHR): An Academic, Peer-Reviewed Journal
All Boston Congress of Public Health (BCPH) branding and content, including logos, program and award names, and materials, are the property of BCPH and trademarked as such. BCPHR articles are published under Open Access license CC BY. All BCPHR branding falls under BCPH.
Use of BCPH content requires explicit, written permission.