Child-Centered and Nutrition-Sensitive Green Spaces: Policy Recommendations for Childhood Obesity Prevention in the Philippines’ Urban Poor Communities

By Julius Cesar Alejandre, MSc, Princess Jean Algones, RND, Nasudi Soluta, RND, Rachel Henry, BSc(Hons), Mary Lynch, PhD,



Alejandre J, Algones P, Soluta N, Henry R, Lynch M. Child-centered and nutrition-sensitive green spaces: policy recommendations for childhood obesity prevention in the Philippines’ urban poor communities. HPHR. 2022;63. 10.54111/0001/KKK5

Child-Centered and Nutrition-Sensitive Green Spaces: Policy Recommendations for Childhood Obesity Prevention in the Philippines’ Urban Poor Communities


Evidence suggests that green spaces benefit children’s physical activity and healthy eating behaviors. However, inequalities on green space availability and accessibility in deprived urban communities in the Philippines compromise the generation of these health outcomes. Urban planning and development in the country mostly focus on developing roads, buildings, and other ‘gray spaces’ with limited considerations on the value of nature-based public health interventions.


In this policy perspective, we examined existing evidence about the impacts of green spaces on childhood obesity and the determinants that influence green space use among children. We then proposed policy measures that could help in the development of child-centered and nutrition-sensitive green spaces in the country’s urban poor communities.


To optimize the health-promoting benefits of green spaces on children’s health; availability, accessibility, type, safety, and social infrastructures should be considered in developing child-centered and nutrition-sensitive green spaces. We recommend that a green space policy should follow a wider multi-sectoral and systems-based approach by considering social, urban planning, financial, educational, and environmental interventions to holistically prevent childhood obesity in the country’s socioeconomically deprived urban communities.


Childhood obesity is a public health concern aggravated by socioeconomic inequalities.1 Globally, 40.1 million children are overweight.2 In the Philippines, increasing child obesity is compounded by unhealthy eating behaviors and physical inactivity, with children in urban communities getting more overweight.3–5 The development of childhood obesity is associated with dietary behaviors, sedentary lifestyle, socioeconomic deprivation, and urbanization.6–9 In effect, obesity makes children vulnerable to diseases, affecting their health and wellbeing.10–12 At macroeconomic level, obesity is associated with poor economic performance due to health costs and human productivity loss.13,14


Green space provision is part of a holistic public health approach for developing health-promoting behaviors among children, such as engagement with physical activity and healthy eating.15–18 Studies suggest that neighborhood greenness and exposure to green spaces benefit mental health and behavior of children with special needs.19,20 Moreover, contact with green spaces promote regular physical activity and help improve children’s health-related quality of life. 21–23 Despite the benefits of green spaces on public health, specifically in preventing childhood obesity, many communities do not have accessible green spaces (Figure 1).24,25

Figure 1. Scarcity of green spaces in Metro Manila, Philippines

Dwellers in urban poor communities in the Philippines experience inequitable availability of and accessibility to green spaces.26 Affluent communities have more easily accessible green spaces.27 For this reason, the Philippines’ Department of Health proposed the implementation of a national public open spaces policy to close the gaps on the availability and accessibility of outdoor spaces (e.g., green spaces).28 To help inform the development of this policy, we draw and synthesized existing evidence on the determinants that influence green space use among children. We used this knowledge to propose multi-sectoral policy measures for the co-creation of child-centered and nutrition-sensitive green spaces in the Philippines’ urban context.

Determinants of green space use among children

We synthesized six determinants that influence green space use among children. These are age, sex, location, availability, accessibility, and social activities present in green spaces.

1. Age and sex are determinants of green space use.

Younger children have more frequent physical activity in green spaces while school-aged children have longer duration. Moreover, younger children are more active when green spaces have play activities.29 Girls, on the other hand, have low frequency and duration of physical activity in green spaces, especially those from affluent neighborhoods who have better access to motorized transport.29–31

2. Locations are associated with increased children’s engagement with green spaces.

Commonly used green spaces of children are located in schools and residential settings.33–36 Residential green spaces have benefits on children’s physical activity engagement, intensity, and duration.34,37–39 Specifically, children exposed to residential green spaces (i.e., parks, sports fields, nature reserves) spend more time in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Additionally, school-based green spaces (i.e., fields, playgrounds, gardens) could help promote physical activity and vegetable consumption.40–42

3. Availability and accessibility influence children’s frequency and duration of green space use.

The abundance of green spaces is associated with children’s improved nutritional status and increased physical activity.41,43,45 Children in communities without green spaces are likely to become obese due to lack of environmental opportunities to engage with physical activities.41 Moreover, children living closer to green spaces are likely to access these spaces, resulting to increase in physical activity and decrease in screen time.43

4. Social activities sustain children engagement with green spaces.

Increasing mobility through play provisions, infrastructures, and active transport in green spaces are associated with children’s physical activity.29,44,45 Examples of effective play activities are scavenger-hunting, gardening, playground sports, and nature-orienteering.38,39,41 These could help sustain children’s use and engagement with green spaces for longer duration.29–31,37,38,44–46 Parent’s presence could also impact children’s play activities, while their participation could facilitate green space use.29,39,41,45,46

Child-Centered and Nutrition-Sensitive Green Space Policy in the Philippines

Green spaces are fundamental to active, healthy, and livable communities.16 Children’s exposure to green spaces has benefits to their physical, mental, and social health.19-21,47–49 Hence, providing accessible green spaces which are adapted to children’s health and nutrition needs is an imperative public health intervention. The plan to implement a national public open spaces policy spearheaded by the Philippine health department is an essential step for the increased appreciation of nature-based public health interventions in the country. To make this policy more inclusive to children’s needs, context- and evidence-based recommendations for child-friendly green spaces, focusing on areas where the health value of green spaces is often overlooked (e.g., social, urban planning, transportation, financing, education, and environment) is crucial. Hence, we provided five policy recommendations to inform the development of child-centered and nutrition-sensitive green spaces for the Philippines’ urban poor communities.

1. Urban planning should promote active transport networks to accessible green spaces.

Children in urban poor communities have limited access to green spaces for play and socialization. Considering road congestions, crashes, and lack of child-friendly active transport infrastructures in urban poor communities, pathways to green spaces should have safe and functional pedestrian and cycling facilities.50–52 There is an opportunity to build upon the appreciation for bike lanes and footpaths that proliferated in towns and cities throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.53 Creating an abundance of green spaces through these routes could tackle inequalities in accessibility that was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic due to mobility restrictions.54

2. Socioeconomically deprived communities should have greener, safer, and cleaner spaces.

Dense foliage in green spaces facilitates encouraging environments for children’s play and socialization due to temperature regulation.55 The neighborhood retrofit strategy in Makati City, Philippines could be adapted in high-density urban communities with low green cover.56,57 There is also a culture of fear impacting juveniles’ safety in many cities due to perceived unsafe neighborhoods. Specifically, children perceive their outdoor environments to be impacted by events of child abuse, extrajudicial killings, drug use, and insecurity.58 Children’s living environments should be improved through education, decent housing, rehabilitation, healthcare, employment, and sanitation so they can enjoy livable and sustainable communities where they can optimally thrive.57–59

3. Green spaces should have child-friendly, gender-centered, age-specific, and culturally sensitive social clubs and play activities.

Children’s clubs provide spaces for health promotion. There is an opportunity to learn and build upon the initiatives of some Filipino youth organizations that provided mini playgrounds, health services for kids, and resources for clean and green projects.58 Another effective example that could be adapted in the Philippine context is the Welsh food club program that helped improve children’s dietary patterns, physical activity, and social skills through free meals, play activities, and nutrition skills training.60

4. Schools should promote early childhood understanding and appreciation of green spaces.

Evidence suggests that nature-based early childhood education is associated with children’s social skills and play engagement.61 For example, Physical Education programs help improve children’s fitness and engagement with physical activities. These could be more effective if delivered in green spaces.62-65 School gardening is also effective in promoting vegetable consumption among children66 and this could be integrated under the Home Economics curriculum as a tool to develop children’s food literacy, with the support from the education and agriculture departments.66,67

5. Public-private funding scheme could be considered as a financing model for green space development

Public-private partnership has been widely used to fund the country’s infrastructure programs. For instance, the “Green Green Green” program supporting the development of community-based open spaces could be an opportunity to integrate sustainable green space financing within heavily funded infrastructure programs.68


Green spaces are vital for the prevention of childhood obesity and the promotion of child health and nutrition as these provide opportunities for children to engage in physical activities and healthy eating behaviours.69 However, the inequitable availability of and accessibility to green spaces among Filipino children living in urban poor communities compromise these health outcomes. To co-create child-centered and nutrition-sensitive  green spaces in the Philippines’ urban communities, supportive policy and financing facilitated by multi-stakeholder collaboration across health, social service, urban planning, financial, education, and environment sectors at national and local levels are fundamental.


The corresponding author would like to acknowledge Bangor University and the Chevening Scholarship, the UK government’s global scholarship program, funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and partner organizations for the scholarship provided during the conduct of the knowledge synthesis that informed the development of this policy perspective. We would also like to thank Iris Jill Ortiz for creating the Metro Manila green space map for this article.

Disclosure Statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.


    1. O’Dea JA, Chiang H, Peralta LR. Socioeconomic patterns of overweight, obesity but not thinness persist from childhood to adolescence in a 6-year longitudinal cohort of Australian schoolchildren from 2007 to 2012. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1-9.
    2. Development Initiatives. 2020 Global Nutrition Report: Action on equity to end malnutrition. Bristol, UK: Development Initiatives; 2020. Accessed May 31, 2021.
    3. Food and Nutrition Research Institute (FNRI). Expanded National Nutrition Survey: 2019 Results Nutritional Status of Filipino School Children. [PowerPoint presentation on Internet]. Taguig City, Philippines: Food and Nutrition Research Institute; 2021. Accessed June 26, 2021.
    4. Food and Nutrition Research Institute (FNRI). Expanded National Nutrition Survey: 2019 Results Nutritional Status of Filipino Adolescents. [PowerPoint presentation on Internet]. Taguig City, Philippines: Food and Nutrition Research Institute; 2021. Accessed June 26, 2021.
    5. Food and Nutrition Research Institute (FNRI). Expanded National Nutrition Survey: 2018-2019 Individual Level Food Composition Survey. [PowerPoint presentation on Internet]. Taguig City, Philippines: Food and Nutrition Research Institute; 2021. Accessed June 26, 2021.
    6. Gupta N, Shah P, Goel K, et al. Imbalanced dietary profile, anthropometry, and lipids in urban Asian Indian adolescents and young adults. J Am Coll Nutr. 2010;29(2):81-91.
    7. Popkin BM. The nutrition transition and obesity in the developing world. J Nutr. 2001;131(3):871S-873S.
    8. Wardle J, Brodersen NH, Cole TJ, Jarvis MJ, Boniface DR. Development of adiposity in adolescence: five year longitudinal study of an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of young people in Britain.  2006;332(7550):1130-1135.
    9. Mohan B, Kumar N, Aslam N, et al. Prevalence of sustained hypertension and obesity in urban and rural school going children in Ludhiana. Indian Heart J. 2004;56(4):310-314.
    10. Flegal KM, Troiano RP. Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. Int J Obes. 2000;24(7):807-818.
    11. Rankin J, Matthews L, Cobley S, et al. Psychological consequences of childhood obesity: psychiatric comorbidity and prevention. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2016;7:125.
    12. Warschburger P. The unhappy obese child. Int J Obes. 2005;29(2):S127-9.
    13. Daniels SR. The consequences of childhood overweight and obesity. Future Child. 2006;16(1):47-67.
    14. Reilly JJ, Kelly J. Long-term impact of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence on morbidity and premature mortality in adulthood: systematic review. Int J Obes. 2011;35(7):891-898.
    15. Andreyeva T, Long MW, Henderson KE, Grode GM. Trying to lose weight: diet strategies among Americans with overweight or obesity in 1996 and 2003. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(4):535-542.
    16. WHO Regional Office for Europe (WHO-Europe). Urban green spaces: a brief for action. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2017. Accessed May 31, 2021.
    17. White M, Smith A, Humphryes K, Pahl S, Snelling D, Depledge M. Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. J Environ Psychol. 2010;30(4):482-493.
    18. Lachowycz K, Jones AP. Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):e183-e189.
    19. Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N. Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(5):e9-e9.
    20. Amoly E, Dadvand P, Forns J, et al. Green and blue spaces and behavioral development in Barcelona schoolchildren: the BREATHE project. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(12):1351.
    21. Kim JH, Lee C, Sohn W. Urban natural environments, obesity, and health-related quality of life among hispanic children living in inner-city neighborhoods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1):121.
    22. Babey SH, Hastert TA, Yu H, Brown ER. Physical activity among adolescents: when do parks matter?. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(4):345-8.
    23. Knobel P, Maneja R, Bartoll X, et al. Quality of urban green spaces influences residents’ use of these spaces, physical activity, and overweight/obesity. Environ Pollut. 2021;271:116393.
    24. Nestle M, Jacobson MF. Halting the obesity epidemic: a public health policy approach. Public Health Rep. 2000;115(1):12-24.
    25. Carver A, Timperio A, Crawford D. Playing it safe: The influence of neighbourhood safety on children’s physical activity – A review. Health Place. 2008;14(2):217-227.
    26. Racoma, BA. Green Spaces of Metro Manila. Manila: The Barometer; 2019. Green Spaces of Metro Manila | by BA | The Barometer | Medium. Accessed June 29, 2021.
    27. The Divide in our Cities. Philippines: Commoner; 2021. The Divide in our Cities. Accessed June 29, 2021.
    28. Department of Health (DOH). Draft Guidelines on the Creation and Use of Public Open Spaces for the Promotion of Physical and Mental Health and Well-being During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Manila, Philippines: Department of Health; 2022.
    29. Floyd MF, Bocarro JN, Smith WR, et al. Park-based physical activity among children and adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(3):258-265.
    30. Mitchell CA, Clark AF, Gilliland JA. Built environment influences of children’s physical activity: examining differences by neighbourhood size and sex. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1):130.
    31. Evenson KR, Cho GH, Rodríguez DA, Cohen DA. Park use and physical activity among adolescent girls at two time points. J Sports Sci. 2018;1-7.
    32. Traynor O, Martin A, Johnstone A, Chng NR, Kenny J, Mccrorie P. A low-cost method for understanding how nature-based early learning and childcare impacts on children’s health and wellbeing. Front Psycho. 2022;13(889828).
    33. Buck C, Tkaczick T, Pitsiladis Y, et al. Objective measures of the built environment and physical activity in children: from walkability to moveability. J Urban Health. 2015;92(1):24-38.
    34. Ward JS, Duncan JS, Jarden A, Stewart T. The impact of children’s exposure to greenspace on physical activity, cognitive development, emotional wellbeing, and ability to appraise risk. Health Place. 2016;40:44-50.
    35. Wood C, Gladwell V, Barton J. A repeated measures experiment of school playing environment to increase physical activity and enhance self-esteem in UK school children. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108701.
    36. Alexander DS, Huber LRB, Piper CR, Tanner AE. The association between recreational parks, facilities and childhood obesity: a cross-sectional study of the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health. J Epidemiol Community Health.
    37. Quigg R, Gray A, Reeder AI, Holt A, Waters DL. Using accelerometers and GPS units to identify the proportion of daily physical activity located in parks with playgrounds in New Zealand children. Prev Med. 2010;50(5-6):235-240.
    38. Wheeler BW, Cooper AR, Page AS, Jago R. Greenspace and children’s physical activity: a GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH project. Preventive Medicine. 2010;51(2):148-152.
    39. Fair ML, Kaczynski AT, Hughey SM, Besenyi GM, Powers AR. Peer Reviewed: An Initiative to Facilitate Park Usage, Discovery, and Physical Activity Among Children and Adolescents in Greenville County, South Carolina, 2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14.
    40. Sarti A, Dijkstra C, Nury E, Seidell JC, Dedding C. ‘I Eat the Vegetables because I Have Grown them with My Own Hands’: Children’s Perspectives on School Gardening and Vegetable Consumption. Children & Society. 2017;31(6):429-440.
    41. Schalkwijk AA, van der Zwaard BC, Nijpels G, Elders PJ, Platt L. The impact of greenspace and condition of the neighbourhood on child overweight. Eur J Public Health. 2017;28(1):88-94.
    42. Barton J, Sandercock G, Pretty J, Wood C. The effect of playground-and nature-based playtime interventions on physical activity and self-esteem in UK school children. Int J Environ Health Res. 2015;25(2):196-206.
    43. Akpinar A. Urban green spaces for children: A cross-sectional study of associations with distance, physical activity, screen time, general health, and overweight. Urban For Urban Green. 2017;2:66-73.
    44. Buck C, Tkaczick T, Pitsiladis Y, et al. Objective measures of the built environment and physical activity in children: from walkability to moveability. J Urban Health. 2015;92(1):24-38.
    45. Bocarro JN, Floyd MF, Smith WR, et al. Social and Environmental Factors Related to Boys’ and Girls’ Park-Based Physical Activity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12.
    46. Akpınar A, Cankurt M. Parental influence on children’s physical activity in urban green spaces. J Fac For Istanb Univ. 2016;66(2):471-482.
    47. Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, et al. Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review. Environ Int. 2016;86:60-67.
    48. Tsiros MD, Olds T, Buckley JD, et al. Health-related quality of life in obese children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2009;33(4):387-400.
    49. Zeller MH, Modi AC. Predictors of health‐related quality of life in obese youth.  2006;14(1):122-130.
    50. Hacohen S, Shvalb N, Shoval S. Dynamic model for pedestrian crossing in congested traffic based on probabilistic navigation function. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2018;86:78-96.
    51. Verzosa N, Miles R. Severity of road crashes involving pedestrians in Metro Manila, Philippines. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;94:216-226.
    52. Leather J, Fabian H, Gota S, Mejia A. Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities States and Issues. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank; 2011. Accessed May 31, 2021.
    53. Douglas I, Champion M, Clancy J, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic: local to global implications as perceived by urban ecologists. Socioeco Prac Res. 2020;2:217-228.
    54. Burnett H, Olsen JR, Nicholls N, Mitchell R. Change in time spent visiting and experiences of green space following restrictions on movement during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationally representative cross-sectional study of UK adults. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e044067.
    55. Bolund P, Hunhammar S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ. 1999;29(2):293-301.
    56. Moriwake N, Palijon AM, Takeuchi K, Murakami A, Tsunekawa A. Distribution and structure of urban green spaces in Metro Manila. Manila, Philippines: University of the Philippine Press; 2002.
    57. Pobre K, Lannon SC. Effectiveness of neighbourhood retrofit strategies in mitigating the urban heat island in Salcedo Village, Philippines. PLEA 2016 – Cities, Buildings, People: Towards Regenerative Environments. 2016;3:1524-1530.
    58. Racelis M, Aguirre ADM. Child rights for urban poor children in child friendly Philippine cities: views from the community. Environ Urban. 2002;14(2):97-113.
    59. Sharma K, Reutergardh LB. Exposure of preschoolers to lead in the Makati area of Metro Manila, the Philippines. Environ Res. 2000;83(3): 322-332.
    60. McConnon L, Morgan K, Van Godwin J, Hawkins J, Bond Amy, Fletcher A. Food and Fun School Holiday Enrichment Programme. Cardiff, UK: Welsh Government; 2016. Accessed May 31, 2021.
    61. Johnstone A, Martin A, Cordovil R, Fjørtoft I, Iivonen S, Jidovtseff B, Lopes F, Reilly JJ, Thomson H, Wells V, McCrorie P. Nature-based early childhood education and children’s social, emotional and cognitive development: a mixed-methods systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):5967.
    62. Santos NC, Tanchoco CC, Tan RC. Physical Activity Homework: A Program for Schoolchildren. J NDAP. 2012;26:(1,2).
    63. Marchant E, Todd C, Cooksey R, Dredge S, Jones H, Reynolds D, Stratton G, Dwyer R, Lyons R, Brophy S. Curriculum-based outdoor learning for children aged 9-11: A qualitative analysis of pupils’ and teachers’ views. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0212242.
    64. Turtle C, Convery I, Convery K. Forest schools and environmental attitudes: A case study of children aged 8–11 years. Cogent Education. 2015;2(1):1100103.
    65. O’Brien L. Learning outdoors: the Forest School approach. Education. 2009;37(1):45-60.
    66. Miura S, Kunii O, Wakai S. Home gardening in urban poor communities of the Philippines. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2003;54(1):77-88.
    67. National Nutrition Council (NNC). Philippine Plan of Action for Nutrition 2017-2022: A call to urgent action for Filipinos and its leadership. Taguig City, Philippines: National Nutrition Council; 2017. Accessed May 31, 2021.
    68. Department of Budget and Management (DBM). Guidelines on the Implementation of the Local Government Support Fund (LGSF)-Assistance to Cities in the FY 2018 General Appropriations Act (GAA), Republic Act (RA) No. 10964. Manila, Philippines: Department of Budget and Management; 2018. Accessed May 31, 2021.
    69. Alejandre JC, Lynch M. “Kids Get in Shape with Nature”: A Systematic Review Exploring the Impact of Green Spaces on Childhood Obesity. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2020;66(Supplement):S129-33.

About the Authors

By Julius Cesar Alejandre, MSc

Julius is a health promotion specialist with background in health and nutrition policy development and programme planning. He is currently a doctoral researcher and Hydro Nation scholar of the Scottish Government at Glasgow Caledonian University. His areas of work focus on implementation research of nature-based public health interventions, environmentally-informed pharmaceutical prescribing, and sustainable food systems. Julius received his BSc in Nutrition from University of the Philippines Los Baños and MSc in Public Health & Health Promotion from Bangor University in Wales.

Princess Jean Algones, RND

Princess is a nutritionist currently working as a consultant for an international NGO. Her areas of work are public health nutrition and data management. She is currently taking her postgraduate degree in public health at University of the Philippines Manila. She received her BSc in Nutrition from University of the Philippines Los Baños.

Nasudi Soluta, RND

Nasudi specializes in local nutrition policy and planning and nutrition program management. She is currently on her postgraduate degree in public health (nutrition) at Siliman University. She received her BSc in Nutrition from University of the Philippines Los Baños.

Rachel Henry, BSc(Hons)

Rachel is a nutritionist with an advisory role for a community-based food project in Scotland. Her areas of work include community-based and public health nutrition initiatives focusing on health inequalities and food insecurity. She received her BSc (Hons) Nutrition from Queen Margaret University and currently taking her postgraduate study in public health at Glasgow Caledonian University.

Mary Lynch, PhD

Dr Mary Lynch is a professor of nursing and healthcare at the School of Health and Life Science of University of West Scotland and a visiting professor at University of South Wales. Her research areas include social return of investment and cost-benefit analysis of public health interventions. She received her PhD in Health Economics at Queen’s University Belfast.