Allegations of Misconduct

BCPH Stacked Whitebckgrd 04
BCPHR — Allegations of Misconduct
Reference Shelf · Authors and Publishing

Allegations of Misconduct

How BCPHR investigates concerns about research integrity, following COPE guidelines.

ISSN 3068-8558 DOI 10.54111 Open Access · CC BY Updated April 2026

The BCPHR Advisory Board investigates allegations of research misconduct following COPE guidelines. Investigations are conducted transparently and confidentially, with both parties afforded the opportunity to respond.

Why This Matters

How BCPHR Investigates Concerns

BCPHR is committed to the integrity of the scholarly record. Allegations and suspicions of research misconduct are reviewed and investigated by the BCPHR Advisory Board following COPE guidelines. All investigations are conducted transparently while respecting and maintaining confidentiality for both complainants and respondents. This page describes what counts as misconduct, how to report a concern, and how investigations proceed.

What Counts as Misconduct

Types of Research Misconduct

Plagiarism
Fabrication
Falsification
Image Manipulation
Citation Manipulation
Unethical Research Practices

Plagiarism

Passing off another person's work, words, ideas, or data as one's own, including verbatim copying, close paraphrasing, self-plagiarism (text recycling), and unattributed reproduction of figures or tables.

Fabrication

Inventing data or results that were not actually observed or generated. Reporting on participants who do not exist, sites that were not visited, measurements that were not taken.

Falsification

Manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data such that the research record does not accurately reflect what was observed. Includes selective reporting and inappropriate exclusion of data points.

Image Manipulation

Altering figures or images in ways that misrepresent the underlying data, including duplication, splicing, or selective adjustment of brightness or contrast that changes the scientific meaning.

Citation Manipulation

Coercive or excessive self-citation, citation cartels (groups of authors who agree to cite one another), or omission of citations that would have demonstrated prior work or competing interpretations.

Unethical Research Practices

Conducting research without required ethical approvals, failing to obtain informed consent, violating privacy protections, or other breaches of human or animal subjects protections.

The Investigation Process

What Happens When a Concern Is Raised

1

Concern Submitted

Concerns may be raised by anyone (authors, reviewers, readers, institutional officials) and should be submitted in writing to the editorial team with supporting documentation where possible.

2

Initial Editorial Review

The editorial team conducts an initial review to assess whether the concern merits investigation. Concerns deemed credible are referred to the BCPHR Advisory Board.

3

Advisory Board Committee Convened

Three members of the BCPHR Advisory Board are convened as an investigation committee. Members with conflicts of interest in the matter recuse themselves.

4

Notice and Response

If warranted, a notice of investigation is sent to both the complainant and the respondent. Both parties are afforded the opportunity to respond and provide evidence. A deadline for evidence submission is set.

5

Investigation and Decision

The committee reviews all evidence, conducts additional inquiries as needed, and renders a decision. Decisions may include: no action, correction, expression of concern, retraction, notification of the author's institution, or barring from future submission.

6

Communication of Outcome

The decision is communicated to both parties. Where the decision affects published material, a public notice is issued in accordance with the Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern policy.

Confidentiality and Protection

Protections for All Parties

Confidentiality

Investigations are conducted confidentially. The identity of complainants is protected to the extent possible. Respondents are afforded the opportunity to respond before any public action is taken. BCPHR does not publicize investigations until and unless they result in a public notice (correction, expression of concern, retraction).

Bad-Faith Allegations

Allegations made in bad faith (knowingly false, retaliatory, or vexatious) are taken seriously and may themselves result in action against the complainant. BCPHR distinguishes between good-faith concerns that prove unfounded (which are common and welcome) and bad-faith allegations (which are not).

OPEN ACCESS · CC BY

Authors retain rights to their work. All BCPHR manuscripts are freely available without charge. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full texts without prior permission from the publisher or author.

BCPHR Aligns with the Following International Publishing Standards. (Click to Open)
What is PIE-J? PIE-J stands for Presentation & Identification of E-Journals, a National Information Standards Organization Recommended Practice (NISO RP-16-2013). It defines how online journals should present title history, ISSN, publication dates, and edition numbering so that librarians, indexing services, and citation databases can unambiguously identify and cite content. BCPHR follows PIE-J for its edition-to-year crosswalk and article-level identifier consistency, as recommended by PubMed Central.