Editorial Independence and Governance

BCPH Stacked Whitebckgrd 04
BCPHR — Editorial Independence and Governance
Reference Shelf · Editorial Management

Editorial Independence and Governance

How BCPHR separates publisher from journal, and how editorial authority flows.

ISSN 3068-8558 DOI 10.54111 Open Access · CC BY Updated April 2026

BCPH (the publisher) and BCPHR (the journal) are two distinct roles. The Editors-in-Chief hold full authority over editorial content. The publisher does not direct editorial decisions.

Why This Matters

How BCPHR Is Governed

BCPHR is published by the Boston Congress of Public Health (BCPH), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. The publisher and the journal have separate authority structures: BCPH provides infrastructure, financial sustainability, and brand stewardship; BCPHR's editorial team holds full authority over scholarly content. This page describes how that separation is maintained, who makes which decisions, and how BCPHR protects editorial independence.

Publisher and Journal

BCPH and BCPHR: Two Roles, One Mission

P

BCPH (Publisher)

  • Boston Congress of Public Health, 501(c)(3) nonprofit
  • Provides editorial infrastructure (Scholastica, hosting, archiving)
  • Manages financial sustainability of the journal
  • Oversees brand and trademark
  • Publishes the journal but does not direct editorial decisions
  • Contact: BCPH Board of Directors
J

BCPHR (Journal)

  • Academic peer-reviewed public health journal
  • Editors-in-Chief hold full authority over editorial content
  • Editorial Board oversees peer review and special editions
  • Advisory Board investigates misconduct allegations
  • Editorial decisions are not subject to publisher veto
  • Contact: BCPHR Editorial Team

The Separation Matters

Publishers and journals are sometimes the same organization, but they perform different functions. BCPH (the publisher) provides the infrastructure that makes BCPHR possible, but does not influence which manuscripts are accepted, which reviewers are chosen, or how editorial decisions are made. The Editors-in-Chief have full authority over the entire editorial content of BCPHR and the timing of publication of that content.

Editorial Authority

Who Decides What

1

Editors-in-Chief

Hold final authority over all editorial decisions. Approve acceptances, rejections, and revisions. Set editorial direction. Cannot be overruled by the publisher on editorial content.

2

Deputy Editors

Lead special and topic editions. Reach out to subject matter experts. Manage editorial review of submissions in their area. Recommend decisions to Editors-in-Chief.

3

Managing Editors

Oversee day-to-day editorial operations. Conduct initial review of submissions. Ensure submission guidelines are followed. Coordinate communication between authors, reviewers, and editors.

4

Associate Editors

Shepherd individual manuscripts through peer review. Assign reviewers. Synthesize reviewer comments. Recommend decisions to Editors-in-Chief.

5

Editorial Board

Recognized experts in public health subject areas. Provide strategic guidance. Review the journal's direction periodically. Members are listed on the Editorial Board page with affiliations and ORCIDs.

6

Advisory Board

Senior advisors who investigate allegations of research misconduct (per the Allegations of Misconduct process). Three members convene as an investigation committee when concerns arise.

Editorial Independence

Fair Play and Editorial Independence Statement

Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study validity, clarity) and their relevance to the journal's mission and vision (scope and aims), without regard to the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy, or institutional affiliation.

Decisions to edit and publish are not determined by the policies of governments, the publisher, or any other agencies outside of BCPHR. The Editors-in-Chief have full authority over the entire editorial content of BCPHR and the timing of publication of that content.

What Editorial Independence Means in Practice

The publisher does not see manuscripts before publication. The publisher does not select reviewers. The publisher does not approve or veto editorial decisions. The publisher does not direct what topics the journal covers. If a tension arises between the publisher's interests and editorial integrity, editorial integrity wins.

Becoming an Editor

How Editors Are Chosen

Peer reviewers who submit at least four exemplary reviews may be invited (or may submit an inquiry) to join the editorial board of BCPHR. Editors generally begin as associate editors, shepherding manuscripts through the editorial process. Associate editors may be promoted to deputy editor and managing editor positions over time. Detailed information about becoming an editor is available on the Join the Team page.

OPEN ACCESS · CC BY

Authors retain rights to their work. All BCPHR manuscripts are freely available without charge. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full texts without prior permission from the publisher or author.

BCPHR Aligns with the Following International Publishing Standards. (Click to Open)
What is PIE-J? PIE-J stands for Presentation & Identification of E-Journals, a National Information Standards Organization Recommended Practice (NISO RP-16-2013). It defines how online journals should present title history, ISSN, publication dates, and edition numbering so that librarians, indexing services, and citation databases can unambiguously identify and cite content. BCPHR follows PIE-J for its edition-to-year crosswalk and article-level identifier consistency, as recommended by PubMed Central.